The following advocacy methods were developed for land use program advocacy but work just as well in other settings such as advocating grange membership or programs.  Read through and see if you think it makes sense!

​Land Use Communications Worksheet

Effective communication builds important leverage to advance your advocacy to protect and preserve Oregon's working lands. Whether you’re talking to a legislator or county commissioner, preparing testimony for a public hearing, or writing a letter-to-the-editor, you can use the communication tools described below to gain support for your position.

Decision-makers responsible for land use planning decisions affecting working lands depend on first-hand input from farmers, ranchers, and foresters — but most don’t have a direct connection to working lands or experience with land use planning. It is essential to succinctly convey information about your agricultural operation and how a strong land use planning program supports the working lands industry and all Oregonians.

The Introduction

Develop credibility and build rapport with the decision-maker by sharing information about your agricultural operation. Create your introduction today and it can be reused — with minor adjustments — in future advocacy:
● Introduce yourself and your agricultural operations (e.g. location, crops, size, farm practices, market etc.);
● Explain the connection between the location, climate, or soil conditions that support your agricultural operation; and
● Describe how your agricultural operation benefits from sound land use planning decisions. If applicable, provide a specific example of how unwise land use planning decisions or lack of enforcement of a land use decision have caused economic damages or challenges to your agricultural operation.

The Persuasive Four-Part Communication Plan

Getting a decision-maker to agree with your position on a specific subject requires thoughtful communications. Through your introduction, you established credibility on the subject of agriculture and land use planning and gained rapport with the decision-maker. It’s time to move onto advocacy. After the introduction, most successful communications campaigns can be broken down into four simple parts:

Part 1: Shared Value

Begin your statement with a widely held common value that relates to the issue at hand. Starting with shared values helps audiences “hear” our messages more effectively than if we began with dry facts or emotional rhetoric. For example:  Oregon’s economy benefits from a strong agricultural sector.
(Or in a Grange setting maybe: Strong communities benefit the nation and all of us)

Part 2: Present the obstacle

Frame the obstacle as a threat to the shared value. This is a place to use stories and statistics that are likely to resonate with the target audience. But the rapid encroachment of urban development onto irreplaceable farmland threatens the future of agriculture in our state. In the past five years, our county lost 200 acres of EFU-zoned land to non-farm uses and non-resource rezones.
(In a Grange setting:  The rise of social media and the Covid virus has made sustaining community much more difficult and also more important)

Part 3: Share the solution

Share a positive, overarching solution to the obstacle and assign responsibility. The county commission should prioritize the preservation of EFU-zoned land to ensure that Oregon’s economy continues to reap the benefits of a strong, viable agricultural sector.
(In the Grange setting:  The Grange encourages community thru networking, common goals of personal improvement and social awareness)

Part 4: Take Action

This is usually where you provide your target audience (e.g. decision-maker or newspaper reader) with a concrete request. I urge you to oppose the application to rezone EFU-zoned land into small-acre, low density rural residential development. Four-parts combined: Oregon’s economy benefits from a strong agricultural sector. But the rapid encroachment of urban development onto irreplaceable farmland threatens the future of agriculture in our state. In the past five years, our county lost 200 acres of EFU-zoned land to non-farm uses and non-resource rezones. The preservation of EFU-zoned land will ensure that Oregon’s economy continues to reap the benefits of a strong, viable agricultural sector. I urge you to oppose the land use application to rezone EFU land into small-acre, low density rural residential development.
(Again in the Grange setting maybe the following:  Would you like to assist in this important work?  Grange membership is open to all persons of good will and always has been)

Other Communications Factors to Consider:

● Letters-to-the-editor typically have a word limit between 200-400 words. Review the requirements before you begin typing.
● Verbal testimony at county commission meetings or legislative hearings is often limited to two-five minutes. Two minutes of testimony approximately equals one page of 12-font, single-spaced text.
● You may be required to bring additional copies of your testimony for all committee or commission members.
● Profiles of legislators and county commissioners are available on their respective government website and may contain useful background information or common interests to use in your letter, testimony, or meeting. 

​July 2020 Clackamas Pomona Legislative Report
 
Governor Brown yesterday extended her declaration of a state of emergency regarding COVID-19 for an additional 60 days, until September 4 due to increasing disease transmission.  In addition, the statewide requirement for face coverings to be worn in indoor public spaces went into effect yesterday.
 
The legislative "Emergency Board" convened on July 14 to allocate another $200 million to support individuals, businesses and cultural organizations hit by the economic effects of the pandemic. Recipients include workers still waiting for unemployment checks, workers who have to quarantine but aren't eligible for other sick leave programs, the Oregon Cares Fund for Black Relief, business with fewer than 25 employees that did not receive Payroll Protection loans, cultural organizations and venues dealing with closures of their facilities.
 
Separately, the Ways & Means Co-Chairs released a framework of cuts and rebalances to address the State’s revenue short-fall for the remainder of the 2019-2021 biennium. Budget writers have proposed to shield state aid to schools, but to cut almost $400 million in other spending and draw down reserves to offset reduced tax collections during the coronavirus pandemic.  Elements of the plan, which legislative leaders released Thursday, July 16, will undergo public hearings July 20-25. Each of the six budget subcommittees has been assigned a target for spending cuts.  A second special session will be called later this summer to enact the budget changes.
 
Notwithstanding Republican Leader Sen Girod’s complaints regarding the majority party’s strict control of the legislative process, most bills passed by large majorities and major policy changes were largely deferred to the upcoming regular session, a welcome change. (Sen. Fred Girod, R-Stayton, a dentist who was first elected to the state House of Representatives in 1992, was elected to lead the Senate Republican caucus for the session.) 
 
1st 2020 Special Session Bills of Interest:
 
Police Reform Package (6 bills):
 
SB 1604 – makes discipline a mandatory subject of collective bargaining.  Passed the Senate (26-0-4), House (57-0-3);
HB 4201 - creates a Joint Committee on Transparent Policing and Use of Force.  Passed the House (55-2-3), Senate (25-1-4); 
HB 4203 – Choke holds will be banned as a means of securing custody or control of an individual and limited to incidents where deadly force is authorized.  Passed the House (52-5-3), Senate (25-1-4); 
HB 4205 - Officers must intervene in instances of excessive force and other serious misconduct. Passed the House (55-2-3), Senate (26-0-4);
HB 4207 - Creates an online database of officer misconduct. A city would also have immunity from civil action for releasing that information. Passed the House (54-3-3), Senate (26-1-3).
HB 4208 - bans the use of projectile fired tear gas or other irritants to disperse public disturbances, but allows their use during a declared riotPassed the House (53-4-3), Senate (25-2-3).
 
Liability Protection:   The Legislature’s presiding officers sent the issue to a workgroup
 
Housing Stability
 
HB 4204 enacts a moratorium on foreclosures until September 30 and gives homeowners an opportunity to roll payments plus interest to the end of their loan. Passed the House (39-18-3), Senate (19-8-3).
HB 4213 extends the moratorium on residential and commercial evictions until September 30, 2020 and provide a 6-month grace period for repayment. Passed the House (43-14-3), Senate (19-8-3).
HB 4212 Omnibus bill covering a range of issues. Passed the House (47-10-3), Senate (21-4-5).
 
Other Bills
 
SB 1603 -  Expands the Oregon Universal Service Fund (OUSF) to include cell phone users in the fee pool to fund a broadband grant program. Senate (16-10-4), House (38-19-3).
SB 1601 - allows State Transportation Improvement Fund (STIF) monies to be used to maintain existing public services. Passed the Senate (27-0-3); House (55-2-3).
SB 1602 - requires the governor to facilitate mediation sessions between the forest industry and environmental interest representatives. Passed the Senate (24-2-4); House (57-0-3).
SB 1605 - modifies the Oregon Promise program to extend eligibility to certain Oregon foster children who attain their highest level of education while in out-of-state placements. Passed the Senate (26-0-4); House (57-0-3).
SB 1607 - extends for one-year small school district grants and school district funding for foreign exchange students. Passed the Senate (26-0-4); House (56-0-4).
SB 5711 - budget bill to implement legislation passed during the regular session. Passed the Senate (25-1-4); House (57-0-3).
 
HB 4202 - makes a series of technical fixes to the Commercial Activity Tax, which was passed during the 2019 session. Passed the House (25-1-4); House (55-2-3).
 
HB 4206 -  Authorized State Department of Agriculture to adopt rules establishing program of state inspection for processing and sale of meat.
Action: Several Republican members of the House spoke in support of the bill, but there was limited discussion and it passed out of committee without objection. The bill passed out of both the House and Senate unanimously.
HB 4209 – Technical fix to Eastern Oregon Border Economic Development Board regulations  Passed the House (56-0-4); Senate (27-0-3).
HB 4210 - repeals driving privilege suspension and eliminates imposition of driving privilege restrictions for failure to pay fines. Passed the House (44-13-3); Senate (20-7-3).
HB 4211 – Technical fix clarifies the timing of when the Oregon Department of Education is required to make transfers from Fund for Student Success.  Passed the House (52-5-3); Senate (27-0-3).
HB 4214 - declares Oregon policy regarding Native American children. Passed the House (57-0-3); Senate (26-0-4).
 
Finally, the federal district court allowed an extension for signature gathering from Initiative Petition 57, the effort to take redistricting out of the hands of the legislature and Secretary of State. The Court recognized the extenuating circumstances for signature gathering, but additional legal moves are in the works including an appeal from the State Attorney General’s office. 

My report today focuses on two items. 

1. Community TV

As you may know this Pomona is attempting to sponsor a candidate forum, some would call it a debate, for the Clackamas County Commission candidates.  Due to the Covid 19 situation it is to risky to gather and do it in person, so your legislative committee has been seeking other methods.  We have settled on three sessions, one for each position,  filmed at the Willamette Falls Media Center (WFMC) and broadcast on the CAN (community access network) available county wide and also posted on Utube.  This is possible because the WFMC is willing to film and broadcast the sessions at nominal cost as a public service.   They also provide numerous free classes on film making and cover many government meetings for broadcast on the community channels. They can afford to do this because state law says they get a small percentage of everyone’s cable bills through the cable companies franchise fees.  There is a move afoot both legally and legislatively to essentially make this money optional.  The proposal would allow each jurisdiction to decide whether to keep the franchise money currently allocated to the WFMC.  The proposal would disrupt the current funding mechanism, probably result in closure of media centers state wide and thus further limit government transparency.  If you have not guessed I don’t like the idea.
​
         2.   Legislative quorum requirements 
Democrats and Republicans in the Oregon Legislature may not agree on much, but everyone agrees that the recent short legislative session was a failure. This seems likely to repeat in future sessions unless something is done.  The majority caucus in the legislature is proposing lowering the quorum requirements which would eliminate minority parties ability to oppose legislation by denying quorum.  The following is a more balanced idea published in an article by Brent Barton, a lawyer who formerly served as the Democratic representative for House District 40 - Oregon City, in the Oregon Legislature.
First, lower the quorum requirement from two-thirds of legislators per chamber to a simple majority, similar to current majority party proposals.  This change would bring Oregon in line with most other states.
Second, raise the threshold to pass policy bills, but not budget bills, from a simple majority of legislators to two-thirds, but only in the short session. This would focus activity in the short session on budget fixes and consensus legislation, exactly as voters intended when adopting annual sessions in 2010.
Third, prohibit fraudulent use of the emergency clause, particularly on policy bills.  Possibly provide a legal avenue to challenge such use in the courts.
In my opinion pushing the Cap and Trade legislation in the short session, and then attaching the emergency clause was an abuse of power by the majority party and deserved to be shut down.  However, denying quorum during the regular session on a legitimate issue  that a majority of duly elected representatives favored and were elected on is also an abuse of power and should not be tolerated. 
In essence, current Republican legislators appear to be normalizing the nuclear option of denying quorum, something that is inconsistent with a functional legislative branch. Oregon should join most other states, including Washington, in lowering its quorum requirement– a change that would encourage parties to compete for relevance by winning elections, not fleeing Salem.
Partisan competition is a fact of legislative life. But we should minimize this friction in the short session by channeling it into the long session, where parties and legislators can duke out competing ideas.